A New Method In The AHP-Weighting Of Criteria For Supplier Selection

Agus Ristono, Tri Wahyuningsih, Agus Munandar

Abstract


In the coming years, researchers in the supplier selection are more likely to use a combination of methods of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). One method of MCDM which often used in such combinations is Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The function of AHP in the combination of MCDM is as the weighting in each criterion. In the AHP weighting, it has a very important problem. The problem is difficult to obtain consistent results when the amount of matrix is relatively large. This study proposes a new methodology to solve the problem. The results of this study indicate that the proposed method is able to fix the inconsistent matrix data of wise pair comparison to be consistent.


Keywords


Analytic Hierarchy Process, criteria, consistency index, multi-criteria decision making

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., and Passaro, R. (2012). AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18, 3, 159 – 172.

Chen, Z., and Yang, W. (2011). A MAGDM based on constrained FAHP and FTOPSIS and its application to supplier selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54, 11-12, 2802 – 2815.

Ertay, T., Kahveci, A., and Tabanlı, R. M. (2011). An integrated multi-criteria group decision-making approach to efficient supplier selection and clustering using fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24, 12, 1152-1167.

Falsini, D., Fondi, F., and Schiraldi, M. M. (2012). A logistics provider evaluation and selection methodology based on AHP, DEA, and linear programming integration. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 17, 4822 - 4829.

Freeman, J., and Chen, T. (2015). Green supplier selection using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS framework. Supply Chain Management, 20, 3, 327 – 340.

Ghorbani, M., Arabzad, S. M., and Shahin, A. (2013). A novel approach for supplier selection based on the Kano model and fuzzy MCDM. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 18, 5469 - 5484.

Haldar, A., Ray, A., Banerjee, D., and Ghosh, S. (2012). A hybrid MCDM model for resilient supplier selection. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 7, 4, 284 - 292.

Hruška, R., Průša, P. and Babić, D. (2014). The use of AHP method for selection of supplier. Transport, 29, 2, 195 - 203.

Junior, F. R. L., Osiro, L., and Carpinetti, L. C. R., 2014. A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194 – 209.

Kasirian, M. N., Yusuff, R. M., and Ismail, M. Y. (2010). Application of AHP and ANP in supplier selection process-a case in an automotive company. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 5, 2, 125 - 135.

Li, Y., Liu, X., and Chen, Y. (2012). Supplier selection using axiomatic fuzzy set and TOPSIS methodology in supply chain management. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 11, 2, 147 – 176.

Pitchipoo, P., Ponnusamy, V., and Sivaprakasam, R., (2013a). Fuzzy Hybrid Decision Model for Supplier Evaluation and Selection. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 13, 3903 – 3919.

Pitchipoo, P., Ponnusamy, V., and Sivaprakasam, R., (2013b). Modeling and development of a decision support system for supplier selection in the process industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 9, 1 - 23.

Pitchipoo, P., Venkumar, P., and Rajakarunakaran, S. (2012). A distinct decision model for the evaluation and selection of a supplier for a chemical processing industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 16, 4635 - 4648.

Polat, G. (2016). Subcontractor selection using the integration of the AHP and PROMETHEE methods. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22, 8, 1042-1054.

Polat, G., and Eray, E. (2016). An integrated approach using AHP-ER to supplier selection in railway projects. Procedia Engineering, 123, 415 – 422.

Pramanik, D., Haldar, A., Mondal, S. C., Naskar, S. K., and Ray, A. (2017). Resilient supplier selection using AHP-TOPSIS-QFD under a fuzzy environment. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 12, 1, 45-54.

Ramanathan, R. (2007). Supplier selection problem: integrating DEA with the approaches of the total cost of ownership and AHP. Supply Chain Management, 12, 4, 258 – 261.

Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 1, 9–26.

Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145 (1), 85–91.

Saaty, T. L., and Kearns, K. P. (1985). Analytical planning: The organization systems. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 35-36.

Saaty, T. L., and Shang, J. S. (2011). An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based multi-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts. European Journal of Operational Research, 214, 3, 703–715.

Sevkli, M., Lenny-Koh, S. C., Zaim, S., Demirbag, M., and Tatoglu, E. (2007). An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: a case study of BEKO in Turkey. International Journal of Production Research, 45, 9, 1973 - 2003.

Viswanadham, N., and Samvedi, A. (2013). Supplier selection based on supply chain ecosystem, performance, and risk criteria. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 21, 6484 - 6498.

Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., and Leung, J. P. F. (2009). A note on the application of the data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Research, 47, 11, 3121 - 3138.

Yadav, V., and Sharma, M. K. (2015). An application of a hybrid data envelopment analytical hierarchy process approach for supplier selection. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28, 2, 218 – 242.

Yang, C., and Chen, Y. B. S. (2006). Supplier selection using a combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17, 7, 926 – 941.

Yücenur, G. N., Vayvay, Ö., and Demirel, N. Ç. (2011). Supplier selection problem in global supply chains by AHP and ANP approaches under fuzzy environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56, 5, 823 – 833.

Zhang, X., Lee, C. K. M., and Chen, S. (2012). Supplier evaluation and selection: a hybrid model based on DEAHP and ABC. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 7, 1877 - 1889.

Zolfani, S. H., Chen, I. S., Rezaeiniya, N., and Tamošaitienė, J. (2012). A hybrid MCDM model is encompassing AHP and COPRAS-G methods for selecting company suppliers in Iran. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18, 3, 529 – 543.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31098/ess.v1i1.96

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 51 times
PDF - 26 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Agus Ristono, Tri Wahyuningsih, Agus Munandar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PUBLISHED BY:

LPPM UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta, RSF PRESS & RESEARCH SYNERGY FOUNDATION

Proceeding of LPPM UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta Conference Series 2020 – Engineering and Science (ESS). 

Mailing Address: 
Research Synergy Foundation
Jalan Nyaman no 31 
Komplek Sinergi Antapani 
Bandung 40291 - Indonesia. 

Gedung Rektorat Lt. 3 
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "VETERAN" Yogyakarta 
Jl. SWK 104 (Lingkar Utara)
Condong Catur
Yogyakarta 55283 - Indonesia. 

Email:info@upnconfeseries.com

 
The Proceeding of LPPM UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta Conference Series 2020 – Engineering and Science (ESS) is indexed by:
 
  
 
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.