Climate Policies in Indonesia’s Development Agenda: Why a Carbon Tax is Marginalised

Rakhmindyarto Rakhmindyarto

Abstract


Drawing on the results of an exploratory qualitative study based on in-depth interviews involving government executives, politicians, business players, and non-government organisations (NGOs), this paper explores climate policies in Indonesia’s national development agenda, including whether a carbon tax could be one of the national priority policy goals. The results suggest that there is heterogeneity in how Indonesian key stakeholders perceive climate policies in Indonesia’s development agenda. Indonesian stakeholders are cognisant of the adverse impacts of climate change on social, economic, and environmental aspects. They also acknowledge that having clear and sound climate mitigation policies is required to achieve Indonesia’s ambitious GHG emissions reduction target. However, Indonesia’s development policy goals are focusing on economic growth, in particular boosting infrastructure investments, reducing poverty and inequality, and job expansion. This makes climate policies are compromised and has created conflicts between Indonesia’s development agenda and its commitment to deal with climate change issues. Overall, the study finds that climate policies are incompatible with Indonesia’s development agenda, therefore a carbon tax is placed at the bottom of the national policy goals.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrew, J., Kaidonis, M. A., & Andrew, B., 2010. Carbon tax: Challenging neoliberal solutions to climate change. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(7), pp. 611-618.

Bappenas, 2014. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah 2015-2019 (Vol. Book 1). Jakarta: Bappenas.

Baranzini, A., Goldemberg, J., & Speck, S., 2000. A future for carbon taxes. Ecological Economics, 32(3), pp. 395-412.

Baranzini, A., Van den Bergh, J. C., Carattini, S., Howarth, R. B., Padilla, E., & Roca, J., 2017. Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(4), p. e462.

Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E., 1971. The use of standards and prices for protection of the environment. In The economics of environment (pp. 53-65): Springer.

Baylis, K., Fullerton, D., & Karney, D. H., 2013. Leakage, Welfare, and Cost-Effectiveness of Carbon Policy. American Economic Review, 103(3), pp. 332-337.

Bureau, B., 2011. Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France. Energy Economics, 33(1), pp. 121-130.

Charmaz, K., 2014. Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.

Crowley, K., 2017. Up and down with climate politics 2013–2016: the repeal of carbon pricing in Australia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(3), p. e458.

Dexter, A., 1970. Elite and Specialized Interviewing. Evanston, Ill. Northwestern UniversityPress.

Directorate General of Electricity., 2017. Development Report of 35,000 Electricity Generation. Retrieved from Jakarta:

Dissou, Y., & Eyland, T., 2011. Carbon control policies, competitiveness, and border tax adjustments. Energy Economics, 33(3), pp. 556-564

Feng, K., Hubacek, K., Guan, D., Contestabile, M., Minx, J., & Barrett, J., 2010. Distributional Effects of Climate Change Taxation: The Case of the UK. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(10), pp. 3670-3676.

Fischer, C., & Fox, A. K., 2012. Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64(2), pp. 199-216.

Francis, K, Chapman, Y & Whitehead, D., 2016, An overview of research theory and process, in Z Schneider, D Whitehead, G LoBiondo-Wood & J Haber (eds), Nursing and midwifery methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice, Elsevier Australia, NSW, Australia, pp. 19-32.

Goulder, L. H., & Schein, A. R., 2013. Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: a critical review. Climate Change Economics, 4(03), pp.

Greenwood, C., 2009. Green investing: towards a clean energy infrastructure. Opportunities Beyond Carbon, p. 210.

Guglyuvatyy, E., 2011. Assessing carbon tax and emissions trading as policy options for climate change mitigation in Australia. Sydney: University of New South Wales.

Harrison, K., 2010. The Comparative Politics of Carbon Taxation. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci., 6(1), pp. 507-529.

Hourcade, J.C. and Robinson, J., 1996. Mitigating factors: assessing the costs of reducing GHG emissions. Energy Policy, 24(10-11), pp.863-873.

Hsu, S.L., 2012. The case for a carbon tax: Getting past our hang-ups to effective climate policy: Island Press.

Huang, Y., & Pascual, U., 2018. Aid effectiveness for environmental sustainability. Washington: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jenkins, J. D., & Karplus, V. J., 2017. Carbon Pricing under Political Constraints: Insights for Accelerating Clean Energy Transitions: Oxford University Press.

Kerkhof, A. C., Moll, H. C., Drissen, E., & Wilting, H. C., 2008. Taxation of multiple greenhouse gases and the effects on income distribution: A case study of the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 67(2), pp. 318-326.

Lo, A., 2013. The Political Economy of Carbon Tax: International Practice and the Australian Model. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 1(01). p. 1350007.

Mathur, A., & Morris, A. C., 2014. Distributional effects of a carbon tax in broader U.S. fiscal reform. Energy Policy, 66(C), pp. 326-334.

Mildenberger, M., & Leiserowitz, A., 2017. Public opinion on climate change: Is there an economy–environment tradeoff? Environmental Politics, 26(5), pp. 801-824.

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources., 2016. RUPTL 2016-2025. Jakarta: Kepmen ESDM No. 5899K/20/MEM/2016.

Ministry of Finance, 2009. Ministry of Finance Green Paper: Economic and Fiscal Policy Strategies for Climate Change Mitigation in Indonesia. Jakarta: Fiscal Policy Agency.

Nordhaus, W. D., 2013. The climate casino: Risk, uncertainty, and economics for a warming world: Yale University Press.

Nurdianto, D., & Resosudarmo, B., 2016. The Economy-wide Impact of a Uniform Carbon Tax in ASEAN. Journal of the southeast Asian economies, 33(1), pp. 1-22.

Oates, W.E., 2000. From research to policy: the case of environmental economics. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 4(1), pp.1-15.

Poterba, J., 1991. Tax Policy to Combat Global Warming: On Designing a Carbon Tax. NBER Working Paper Series, 3649.

Rivers, N., 2010. Impacts of climate policy on the competitiveness of Canadian industry: How big and how to mitigate? Energy Economics, 32(5), pp. 1092-1104.

Rozenberg, J., Hallegatte, S., Perrissin-Fabert, B., & Hourcade, J.-C., 2012. Funding low-carbon investments in the absence of a carbon tax. Climate Policy, 13(1), pp. 1-8.

Stern, N., 2008. The economics of climate change. American Economic Review, 98(2), pp. 1-37.

Stiglitz, J. E., Stern, N., Duan, M., Edenhofer, O., Giraud, G., Heal, G., . . . Pangestu, M., 2017. Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition, 29.

Verde, S., & Tol, R., 2009. The Distributional Impact of a Carbon Tax in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 40(3), pp. 317-338.

Walker, K.J., 1989. The state in environmental management: the ecological dimension. Political Studies, 37(1), pp.25-38.

Wang, Q., Hubacek, K., Feng, K., Wei, Y.-M., & Liang, Q.-M., 2016. Distributional effects of carbon taxation. Applied Energy, 184, pp. 1123-1131.

White, R., 2012. NGO engagement in environmental law enforcement: critical reflections. Australasian Policing, 4(1), p. 4.

World Bank., 2017. Carbon Pricing Watch 2017. Washington DC: World Bank Group

Yusuf, A., & Resosudarmo, B., 2015. On the distributional impact of a carbon tax in developing countries: the case of Indonesia. The Official Journal of the Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies / The Official Journal of the East Asian Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, 17(1), pp. 131-156.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31098/pss.v1i1.83

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 127 times
PDF - 4 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 LPPM UPN “VETERAN” YOGYAKARTA CONFERENCE SERIES 2020 – POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE SERIES

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PUBLISHED BY:

LPPM UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta, RSF PRESS & RESEARCH SYNERGY FOUNDATION

Proceeding of LPPM UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta Conference Series 2020 – Political and Social Science (PSS). 

Mailing Address: 
Research Synergy Foundation
Jalan Nyaman no 31 
Komplek Sinergi Antapani 
Bandung 40291 - Indonesia. 

Gedung Rektorat Lt. 3 
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "VETERAN" Yogyakarta 
Jl. SWK 104 (Lingkar Utara)
Condong Catur
Yogyakarta 55283 - Indonesia. 

Email:info@upnconfeseries.com

 
The Proceeding of LPPM UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta Conference Series 2020 – Political and Social Science (PSS) is indexed by:
 
  
 
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.